In response to the article “The Rise of
the NBA Nerd”, I think Morris believes very strongly that the stereotypes of
conventional black culture are changing. He analyzes the dress of people who
would be considered role models (i.e. athletes) to this culture. These same people
who once dressed like "urban gangsters" now dress in a way that could
be compared to a nerd. The abrupt changes in mid to late 2000’s have changed their press conference attire from t-shirts and anything else they
could throw on to plaid shirts, glasses, backpacks and khakis. The author’s rhetoric
is very clean in trying to persuade us to believe his opinion about the
changing black culture. His pictures also go hand in hand with this. The
pictures used on the webpage are only of prominent black athletes
that are dressed in the way he previously described. The
pictures could be taken out of context of course, but there is no way for us to
know for sure. Rhetoric is all about the author’s ability to persuade, and the author
manages to do this job well.
Is what we wear an
argument? Can it be political? I would say yes to both of these questions. An
argument is an expression of opinion. Speech is obviously the best way of
communicating opinions, but is by no means the only way. Paintings, papers, and
even clothing are all acceptable ways of expressing personal opinions. What you
wear can tell what your political, religious, and cultural identities and
beliefs are, or at least can give a bit of insight. For example, the
stereotypical urban gangster wears loose fitting jeans or sweats, along with some
sort of baggy t-shirt. While not everyone who wears this is an urban gangster, most people who are classified as "urban gangsters" would stereotypically wear this. So, since
the basketball stars are no longer wearing this, they are changing the way we view the group
they are stereotyped into. This, as a result, changes the group that black youth are
wishing to be stereotyped into. The argument about the changing
cultural clothing of the black community can be politicized by addressing
whether or not it should be allowed for these stars to influence young minds as
much as they do. The changing identity can be debated, but the benefits to
their culture, and society as a whole can not.
No comments:
Post a Comment